Skip to content
Human Standards

Biases & Heuristics

Cognitive biases are systematic deviations from rational judgment that significantly impact how users interpret information, evaluate options, and complete tasks. Understanding these biases allows designers to create interfaces that simplify decisions, reduce cognitive load, and guide users toward optimal outcomes.

Common cognitive biases in UI design

Section titled “Common cognitive biases in UI design”

Anchoring Bias

Section titled “Anchoring Bias”

Users rely heavily on the first piece of information they encounter, setting a baseline for subsequent judgments. The first price, first option, or first piece of data disproportionately influences decisions.

Loss Aversion

Section titled “Loss Aversion”

Users fear losses more than they value equivalent gains. “Don’t lose your progress” is more motivating than “Save your work.”

Status Quo Bias

Section titled “Status Quo Bias”

Users prefer familiar settings and resist changes, even beneficial ones. Default settings heavily influence user behaviors because changing them requires effort and decision-making.

Choice Overload

Section titled “Choice Overload”

Giving users more choices doesn’t always lead to better decisions. Too many similar options cause users to hesitate, delay, or avoid making a decision altogether.

Confirmation Bias

Section titled “Confirmation Bias”

Users seek information that confirms their existing beliefs and ignore contradictory evidence. Interfaces should present balanced information to counter this tendency.

Mitigations

Section titled “Mitigations”

Smart Defaults:

  • Set defaults that work for most users
  • Make defaults transparent and easy to change
  • Don’t use dark patterns to exploit status quo bias

Clear Comparisons:

  • Use comparison tables for complex choices
  • Highlight key differences between options
  • Avoid overwhelming users with too many choices

Cooling-Off Periods:

  • Add friction to high-stakes decisions (account deletion, large purchases)
  • Provide confirmation steps with clear consequences
  • Allow undo for reversible actions

Balanced Information:

  • Present pros and cons fairly
  • Don’t exploit loss aversion with manipulative messaging
  • Make disclaimers and important information visible

Recent Research (2024-2025)

Section titled “Recent Research (2024-2025)”

Psychology for UX

Section titled “Psychology for UX”

The Nielsen Norman Group updated their Psychology for UX Study Guide in April 2025, covering how cognitive biases and heuristics are mental shortcuts people use to save themselves from doing extra mental work when making sense of the world.

Key Findings on UI Decision-Making

Section titled “Key Findings on UI Decision-Making”

Recent research emphasizes that recognizing and addressing cognitive biases is essential to enhancing user decision-making and minimizing mental friction. Analysis of cognitive biases in interface design (2024) shows that systematic deviations from rational judgment significantly impact how users interpret information.

Real-Time Feedback Integration

Section titled “Real-Time Feedback Integration”

By combining the understanding of cognitive biases with real-time feedback data, designers can optimize interfaces to improve user satisfaction, streamline decision paths, and reduce errors. Studies show that interfaces designed with cognitive biases in mind support responsible decision-making.

Design Applications

Section titled “Design Applications”

Recognizing cognitive bias patterns is essential to work on products that feel intuitive, reduce friction, and support responsible decision-making. Every interface shapes behavior intentionally or unintentionally—understanding biases helps designers create more ethical, effective experiences.

References

Section titled “References”

Foundational Work:

Recent Research:

See Also

Section titled “See Also”
Maintained by AK Lodhi